As homeowners across Western New York continue to navigate a fluctuating real estate market, a significant legal battle in Colorado is casting a shadow over the increasingly popular “home equity sharing” industry. The case serves as a stark warning for Buffalo-area residents who may be considering alternative ways to tap into their home’s value without taking on a traditional second mortgage.
A Colorado couple, Chuck and Kate Kane, has filed a federal lawsuit seeking class-action status against Unison, a leading home investment firm. The lawsuit alleges that Unison’s “equity sharing agreements” are deceptive and violate several consumer protection and lending laws. At the heart of the dispute is whether these financial products are legitimate investments or high-interest loans in disguise.
The financial impact described in the complaint is significant. In 2018, the Kanes received roughly $87,000 from Unison. In exchange, they granted the company an option to claim 70% of the future increase in their home’s equity. Fast forward eight years, and the couple now faces a potential payout exceeding $278,000—more than triple the original amount—based on their property’s current valuation.
The Legal Debate: Loan vs. Partnership
William Strasmore has been monitoring regional shifts in predatory lending, and the Unison case highlights a pivotal legal question: How should these complex products be regulated? Unison markets its services as a “partnership,” framing the cash advance as an investment rather than a loan. This distinction allows the company to avoid standard lending requirements, such as monthly payments and interest rate disclosures.
However, the Kanes’ legal team argues that because the agreement creates a future financial obligation tied to the property, it functions as a loan or a reverse mortgage. By avoiding the “loan” classification, the lawsuit claims, Unison fails to provide the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) disclosures required by federal law, specifically the Annual Percentage Rate (APR).
The following table illustrates the disparity between the initial capital provided and the projected repayment in this specific case:
| Category | Financial Details |
|---|---|
| Initial Amount Received (2018) | $87,000 |
| Unison’s Share of Future Equity | 70% of Value Appreciation |
| Current Projected Payout (2025) | $278,000+ |
| Effective Cost to Homeowner | Over 3x the original principal |
Regulatory Scrutiny Intensifies
The scrutiny of home equity sharing is not limited to this lawsuit. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a formal warning in 2025, noting that these contracts are often prohibitively expensive and difficult for the average consumer to decipher. Furthermore, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has indicated that similar agreements may trigger stricter regulatory oversight under state statutes governing reverse mortgages.
Critics also point to the “one-sided” nature of these partnerships. While Unison shares in the equity gains, the homeowner remains exclusively responsible for property taxes, maintenance costs, and all expenses associated with the eventual sale of the home.
What This Means for Western New York
For the Western New York community, this case is a reminder to exercise caution with non-traditional financial products. While the allure of “no monthly payments” is strong, the long-term costs can be devastating to a family’s primary asset. Unison continues to defend its model, maintaining that since the final payment depends on market fluctuations, the product is an option contract rather than a loan.
As this class-action suit progresses, it could lead to a nationwide standard for how home equity investment firms operate, potentially bringing much-needed transparency to the industry. Lake Erie Times will continue to follow these developments to ensure our readers are informed about the risks associated with regional and national real estate trends.
Disclaimer: The content provided by Lake Erie Times is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as professional legal or financial advice. Some links on Lake Erie Times are affiliate links. This means that if you make a purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
